1 Recruiting-Sourcing Stone for 2 Birds?
你会得到你所付出的回报。你有时会得到更少,但是你永远不可能获得更多。我听到 这在很久很久以前,在某个地方 You get what you pay for. You sometimes get less, but you never get more. Something I heard a long, long time ago, somewhere One stone for two birds? I don t think so. I know all you hiring managers and staffing officials out there would like your recruiters to be expert sourcers and your sourcers to be expert recruiters. I know you all would like to kill two birds with one stone, but I can tell you right now, right here, it s not going to happen. It s not going to happen because the two types of personality types are generally not found (in one person) in an organization. They re found outside organizations in the form of third party recruiters who have been cutting this mustard for years. Now that we ve given this brave and heroic special set the recognition and laurel crown they so richly deserve, let me tell you why you re not likely to find these people inside your organization. You refuse to pay them what they deserve to make. Added to that handicap even if you would pay them close to, at (or above) what they can make on their own they d likely not accept your offer because birds of this rare feather are usually solo practitioners far too independent to cage themselves within the gilded cage of any organization. Truth be told, they probably wouldn t pass muster with your staffing requirements anyway, so let s not spend any more of your valuable time yakkin away about them. Let s get back to the real reason for this article. You re setting yourself up for failure if you believe the current pundits that sourcers can be recruiters and recruiters can be sourcers. Oh, I said that last part already, didn t I? Yes, but it bears repeating and more needs to be said. There are a flurry of products coming at you right now that promise more than they can (really) deliver. Most of your recruiters don t really want to source and most of your sourcers don t really want to recruit. Trust me, I ve thought long and hard on this one. Each skill set requires vastly different personality types. That s the bottom line. Oh, but there s LinkedIn, you re thinking to yourself. LinkedIn isn t sourcing; it s resume farming the same product the job boards have been offering for years. As time goes on and the product continues to sour oh, excuse me, I mean age it will become more and more apparent exactly what it is. Someday LinkedIn will be for sale, just like Monster, probably far below its highs. There ll be some bright new shiny object take its place. The shine wears off everything. Recruiters (as well as some sourcers) are more than willing to turn to and use any product that offers a list of names but it s not a list of names you need in most instances. What s needed is a faculty for sourcing that delivers unique candidates in the shortest amount of time. Unique candidates translate into those who are not easy, or are impossible to find online, and are not polluted by overexposure. It usually takes a sourcer to do that. Most recruiters just plain don t have the time to do it. I say it again: most don t want to do it. Most aren t emotionally equipped to do it they see it as something tedious at best. Most see their time better spent doing things they enjoy like engaging potential candidates delivered by their team-member sourcers. Here s another hardball. Most sourcers don t want to recruit. Most aren t emotionally equipped, either to do it. It s just not something they enjoy. Talking to people? Get outta here, is what runs through most of their heads when the director of the staffing department decides it s time to tighten up the britch belts and squeeze more out of less. That s not the answer. You re barking up the wrong tree. Your sourcers don t want to recruit and your recruiters don t want to source. It takes two and as far as I can see down the road it s going to continue to take two. The lesson here: If you re running a staffing department, don t get it into your head that one person can do both functions. It s rare and the person that can do both is making a couple hundred thousand dollars (plus) a year. Are you paying your recruiters that? Are you paying your sourcers that? If not, it s not too likely either one is going to morph into the other. This article was inspired by this. 管理新知 您可能感兴趣的文章 HR如何才能正确地设定面试题？
2013-10-31 HR微语—如何选择创业伙伴？
2011-10-12 How to handle Situational Job Interview Questions 2011-09-07 最近文章 TEST 2018年01月15日 嫖娼被抓不属无故旷工，公司解雇赔4万！（法院判决） 2018年01月15日 如何判断你是否具有HRBP胜任力？
2018年01月15日 阿里为什么不去清华招人？
2018年01月15日 因利益冲突，Facebook COO和Twitter CEO退出迪士尼董事会 2018年01月15日 热门文章 嫖娼被抓不属无故旷工，公司解雇赔4万！（法院判决） 2018年01月15日 如何判断你是否具有HRBP胜任力？
2018年01月15日 阿里为什么不去清华招人？
2018年01月15日 2017年度职场出差行程调查，出差最多的居然是他们！！
2018年01月12日 员工在自己QQ空间评论HR经理吃屎，可辞退他吗？
2018年01月11日 扫一扫 加微信【已隐去】 关于沙龙 顾问委员 广告推广 隐私安全 联系我们 申请vip会员 支付方式 市场合作或广告投放 电话：【电话已隐去】 邮件：【邮箱已隐去】 在线QQ【已隐去】 VIP会员 企业VIP会员 机构VIP会员 广告刊例 商务合作 Follow HRSalon