What Not to Ask In an Interview
You have read all about what to ask in an interview as well as magic questions that will solve all your hiring problems. What about what not to do? Make no mistake. An interview is not an opportunity to GetToKnowYa, but rather a verbal test. It has subject matter, questions, and answers that are scored. But you need to ask yourself: just exactly what are you testing for? The ability to answer silly questions? Whether you want to be friends? Whether you can trip up or intimidate a candidate? Haven t you seen the thousands of books candidates read to fake their way through an interview? How about learning whether the candidate has the right set of job skill s? You know, so you don t have to waste everyone s time? If You Don t Know What You re Looking for, Any Question Will Do If you don t know the exact skills you are looking for, about the only thing accomplished by asking better questions is not being considered a fool by the candidate. Quality candidates do not like working for fools. Fine-tune questions all day long, but if you don t know exactly what skills the candidate should have to succeed, you have not done your job. Knowing what to look for requires asking employees in the job what KSAs they use day in and day out to get things done. Pay close attention to those words. I did not say what they accomplish. I said, the KSAs they use. Do you think a manager knows them? Good luck with that. Managers are usually the ones who wrote the specs in the first place and are the first to criticize because you don t send them what they need. Unless the manager is also a jobholder, you are talking to the wrong person. Jobholders tell you what works and what doesn t (of course they don t use those words you have to figure them out). Don t Use Questions That Are Easy to Fake You might have heard about asking behavioral questions. You might have even built a list of them. But, behavioral questions are worthless unless you have first done the homework outlined above. Interviews are like a stool with three legs. Questions are only one leg. They will make you sound better, but don t you really want to discover the frequency and quality of the candidate s KSAs? You see, knowing what a candidate accomplished in a past job is only part of the equation. You need to translate that information into whether he/she can use those skills in the future job. Asking only about accomplishments seldom tells you anything about skills and you need to know skill-information because it s the bridge between the old job and the new one. Know How to Score the Answers Let s say you knew the competencies, asked the right kind of behavioral questions, and even got some complete answers (getting complete answers is often very difficult). What do they mean? How do you score them? Many of the behavioral courses I know leave out those teeny-weeny details like balancing on a stool with two legs. You have to get best/worst answers from the same experts you questioned about the job. They can tell you what works and what doesn t. Standardized scoring guides help you stay on course during the interview and decide whether the candidate KSA described from the past is strong enough to work in the future. Don t Rely Entirely on Interview Data Sometimes people have not had the kinds of experience you need, might not articulate clear answers, or might be telling you a fairy tale. Interview data always has to be supported by validated tests and surveys. By validation, I don t mean buying into junk science or believing wild vendor claims. They will only cost you money and poor employees. Junk tools never live up to their promises (tests that force-fit people into little boxes or quadrants are prime examples). If your managers like workshop tests, it s usually because they were amazed when they answered
10 questions about extraversion affirmatively, and their feedback said they were extraverted. Wow! Try explaining that a workshop test might measure differences between people, but that does not mean it predicts skills or job performance. Only trustworthy tools deliver trustworthy results. Conclusion Screening out unqualified people is a challenging task. It can only be done effectively if you know precisely what to look for, know how to ask questions that minimize faking, work from a standardized scoring guide developed in collaboration with hiring managers, and confirm data using a combination of other validated tools. After all, isn t that what you were hired to do? 管理新知 您可能感兴趣的文章
10 Qualities of Exceptional Interviewers 2013-06-19 绩效考核设计：将战略转化为员工行为 2014-01-20 Culture by Cookies 2012-12-29 最近文章 嫖娼被抓不属无故旷工，公司解雇赔4万！（法院判决） 2018年01月15日 如何判断你是否具有HRBP胜任力？
2018年01月15日 阿里为什么不去清华招人？
2018年01月15日 因利益冲突，Facebook COO和Twitter CEO退出迪士尼董事会 2018年01月15日 沪调整城乡居民养老保险有关标准 24日前可就近办理 2018年01月13日 热门文章 嫖娼被抓不属无故旷工，公司解雇赔4万！（法院判决） 2018年01月15日 如何判断你是否具有HRBP胜任力？
2018年01月15日 阿里为什么不去清华招人？
2018年01月15日 2017年度职场出差行程调查，出差最多的居然是他们！！
2018年01月12日 员工在自己QQ空间评论HR经理吃屎，可辞退他吗？
2018年01月11日 扫一扫 加微信【已隐去】 关于沙龙 顾问委员 广告推广 隐私安全 联系我们 申请vip会员 支付方式 市场合作或广告投放 电话：【电话已隐去】 邮件：【邮箱已隐去】 在线QQ【已隐去】 VIP会员 企业VIP会员 机构VIP会员 广告刊例 商务合作 Follow HRSalon